With the ending of a number of the original COVID-19 relief and stimulus initiatives, August and the beginning of September has seen the release of new plans to move into the post-September period. Links to these updates and changes are listed below.

Please click on the following links to access a wide range of Covid-19 related updates, initiatives, guidelines and resources from both Federal and State Governments.
Latest Updates:
Previous Updates:
Jobkeeper Update – Extension to March 2021. Read more ….
Victorian Government Stage 4 Restrictions. Read more ….
Victoria – Health and Human Services – Stage 4 restrictions. Read more ….
Victoria – State Revenue Office – Land Tax. Read more ….
Federal Government COVID-19 Updates. Read more ….
NSW – New round of small business grants. Read more ….
Qld – Round 2 of Small Business COVID-19 Adaption Grant Program opens. Read more ….
Vic – Range of videos explaining topics effected by COVID-19 such as Land tax and Payroll Tax. Read more ….
Tas – An update on all COVID-19 matters in Tasmania. Read more ….
ACT – Updated 30-6-2020. Read more ….
SA – Updates for Land tax deferrals and Job Accelerator Grants. Read more ….
NT – COVID-19 Update. Read more ….
Myths about COVID-19 are all over social media. Here is the our Government's mythbusting response. Read more ….
$131.4 million Federal funding to help Public Hospital fight effects of COVID-19. Read more ….
$48.1 million for mental health & wellbeing pandemic response plan. Read more ….
State and Territory Government websites. Their latest responses to the coronavirus pandemic.
3 Step Framework for a Covidsafe Australia. Click here.
Easing of coronavirus (Covid-19) restrictions. Read more …
The Tax Office has published preliminary guidance on the extension of JobKeeper as the profession continues to wait on the amended rules to be registered.

Following the passage of legislation extending JobKeeper for a further six months to 28 March 2021 this week, the ATO has now published guidance on the changes.
The updated guidance comes despite amendments to the JobKeeper Rules, which will set out the new two-tiered payment rates, yet to be issued by the Treasurer.
Amended rules notwithstanding, the ATO has now detailed the payment rates for the two extension periods, the first running from 28 September 2020 to 3 January 2021, and the second running from 4 January 2021 to 28 March 2021.
For the first extension period, employees who worked for 80 hours or more in the four weeks of pay periods before either 1 March 2020 or 1 July 2020 will receive $1,200 per fortnight, while all other employees will receive $750.
For the second period, the rate will drop to $1,000 per fortnight and $650 per fortnight, respectively.
The ATO noted that businesses currently enrolled in JobKeeper will not need to re-enrol for JobKeeper 2.0, nor will they need to provide an employee nomination notice again.
However, businesses will need to satisfy the decline in turnover test for the September quarter, and subsequently the December quarter, with the ATO stating that it will soon provide further information on how to undertake the calculation.
“For many businesses registered for GST, this calculation will match the ‘total sales’ reported at G1 on your BAS minus GST payable (1A), where applicable,” the ATO said.
“You can provide additional turnover information to demonstrate that you satisfy the actual fall in turnover test for the September quarter from the start of October onwards. You must provide it before you complete your November monthly declaration.”
View the updated ATO guidance here.
View the Treasury JobKeeper Fact Sheets here.
Jotham Lian
04 September 2020
accountantsdaily.com.au
One of the conditions of deductibility of travel expenses, is that the expense is not a private or domestic nature.

Accountants will soon be tasked with providing certificates to businesses being weaned off JobKeeper to enable them to cut employee hours or change their duties under temporary Fair Work changes.

Under new legislation introduced on Wednesday, businesses that qualified for the first round of JobKeeper, but are unable to qualify for JobKeeper 2.0 because they no longer satisfy the 30 per cent decline in turnover test, will still be able to access temporary Fair Work Act provisions for a further six months if they are experiencing a 10 per cent decline in turnover.
These temporary Fair Work Act provisions include being able to reduce employees’ ordinary hours by 40 per cent of the hours they worked before the pandemic struck, and give them directions in relation to duties and location of work.
In order for such businesses to qualify, they will be required to obtain a 10 per cent decline in turnover certificate from a registered company auditor; a registered tax agent, BAS agent or tax (financial) adviser; or a qualified accountant.
These accountants must be independent and external to the employer, and cannot be a director, employee or associated entity.
However, there will be a carve-out for small businesses with fewer than 15 employees to allow such employers to provide a statutory declaration to attest to the 10 per cent decline.
The 10 per cent decline in turnover test periods will align with BAS lodgement dates for each completed quarter.
False or misleading information provided to accountants in order to satisfy the 10 per cent decline in turnover test will face a maximum civil penalty of 60 penalty units for inpiduals or 300 penalty units for a corporate entity.
Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand assurance and reporting leader Amir Ghandar said the practical aspects on providing the 10 per cent decline in turnover test certificate have yet to be worked through with government officials, with engagement only just commencing.
“We will seek to work with the government to make sure the requirements are clear and accord with applicable professional standards,” Mr Ghandar said.
“CAs should be aware of the professional practice and insurance implications in undertaking assurance engagements.
“Employees and the organisations that represent them will rightly take a keen interest in the accountants’ work, and the Federal Court can examine whether an employer has indeed satisfied the 10 per cent test.”
Jotham Lian
27 August 2020
accountantsdaily.com.au
The rules around Superannuation contribution change almost every year, so it is important that taxpayers know what these changes mean to them.

The following outlines what has changed.
An increase in the age required for the work test.
From July 1, 2020, the age required rose from 65 to 67. The main benefit of this change is that it provides, where possible, an additional opportunity to implement voluntary super contribution strategies.
What taxable contributions can be made for the year ending June 30, 2021?
There is a cap of $25,000 per person for those able to make extra contributions to their super during the 2020/21 financial year. Any excess over this concessional contribution (CC) cap is taxed at the inpidual’s marginal tax rate.
CCs are contributions where a tax deduction is claimed and include:
The CC cap will, in most cases, exceed employer contributions in 2020/21. If this is the case, then consideration could be given to adding personal taxable contributions to get you up to the $25,000 limit.
The higher your income, the greater the tax savings and keep in mind that there is no upper age limit for being eligible to receive SGCs.
Carry forward provisions
An indivdual can carry forward CCs if their total superannuation balance (TSB) is less than $500,000.
Unused contributions can be carried forward for five years. This option came into effect in 2019/20.
An important consideration prior to June 30, 2021 is to see if you can utilise this carry forward option to bolster your CCs before the date noted.
Work test
If an inpidual is under 67, there is no work test required to be able to make a contribution.
The work test is where, once you turn 67, you must be able to show that you have been gainfully employed for 40 hours or more in any 30-day period in a financial year.
If an inpidual is between the ages of 67 to 74, they must meet the work test in order to make a contribution.
Splitting of contributions
An inpidual can split their CCs that are made on their behalf to a spouse but they need to meet certain requirements.
The main reasons to split contributions are to:
Spouse rebate for super contributions
A spouse rebate, up to a maximum of $540, can be claimed for superannuation contributions for the year ending June 30, 2021.
If your spouse earns less than $37,000 per year and you contribute $3,000 into superannuation for them, you can claim a tax rebate of $540.
Spouse contributions can be made if you are aged under 75 from July 1, 2020.
What tax-free contributions can be made for 2020/21?
Non-concessional contributions (NCC) are those contributions made into a super fund from after tax income. In this case, an inpidual is not claiming a tax deduction. There is a cap for NCCs of $100,000 for the 2020/21 year.
Members under 65 have an option to contribute up to $300,000 over a three-year period, depending on their total superannuation balance (TSB). The rule works as follows:
TSB NCC and bring forward amount
< $1.4M $300,000 over 3 years
> $1.4 & < $1.5M $200,000 over 2 years
> $1.5 & < $1.6M $100,000 over 1 years
> $1.6M $0 (nil)
To be able to make an NCC, a member must meet the work test, as described above.
The increase from age 65 to 67 also impacts on the ceasing work contribution rule as of July 1, 2020 by given more time to make a NCC.
NCCs can be made on a once-off basis in the financial year after you have ceased employment if your TSB is less than $300,000 as of June 30 in the previous financial year. You also need to be under 75.
Downsizing contributions and how this applies to those over 65 years of age.
From July 1, 2018, anyone 65 years or older can make a downsizer contribution of up to $300,000 from the proceeds of selling their residential home.
The contribution is not an NCC and does not count towards the contribution caps, so it goes into superannuation as a tax-free contribution.
If a member has more than $1.6 million in superannuation, they are still allowed to make a downsizer contribution.
If the downsizer contribution is made and is placed into retirement phase, it will count towards a member’s transfer balance cap, which is $1.6 million.
If you are thinking of downsizing then speaking to a financial planner will help clarify eligibility requirements.
Get more from your super
If you have any questions on the above then simply ask us.
PlannerWeb
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in many Australian expatriates living and working overseas returning to Australia.

In addition, Australian citizens and permanent residents have been restricted or banned from leaving Australia.
Will those expatriates who have returned temporarily due to the COVID-19 crisis be able to resume working overseas?
Some of these will have ceased to be residents for Australian taxation purposes either when they first left Australia or at some later stage in their life overseas. However, will their (temporary?) return to Australia change that status and result in them being treated as residents for Australian tax purposes? Australian Taxation Office guidance continues to evolve.
Although COVID-19 has create unusual circumstances beyond any taxpayer’s control, the taxpayer must still determine their tax residency status, according to the established law, which has not changed. It remains an analysis of many factors.
Intentions and evidence regarding foreign employer leave arrangements and expectation of returning to work overseas, add an extra layer on the already complex question. Any communications with overseas employers and landlords, etc, may be crucial when a decision on tax residency become necessary. But, staying beyond the “lockdown” period may indicate a change of intention.
What can be more complex is taking temporary work in Australia, whilst a foreign tax resident. Is that evidence of a change in intention?
With so many unknowns, if you intend to return overseas, gathering/generating evidence now may tip the balance in your favour.
AcctWeb
The Reserve Bank of Australia has warned the economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic remains uncertain, with its latest figures being worse than those predicted three months earlier.

In its monthly monetary policy update, RBA assistant governor Luci Ellis outlined three scenarios which the economy could take depending on how quickly the virus is contained and restrictions lifted.
In all three scenarios — baseline, an upside and a downside — these will now see Australia’s unemployment rise and its GDP fall, but the levels change based on the health outcome.
The three scenarios all assume international borders will remain closed and travel will be restricted until the middle of next year.
The RBA’s new baseline scenario isn’t what one would normally consider optimistic, with unemployment expected to soar to almost 10 per cent by the end of the year, a figure that was unthinkable at the start of the year.
“The situation in Victoria will reduce growth in the September quarter and push out the recovery beyond that,” said RBA assistant governor Luci Ellis. “That said, activity is expected to continue to recover in much of the country over the rest of this year and next. The recovery is expected to be slow and uneven, and GDP will probably take several years to return to the trend path expected prior to the virus outbreak.”
This will also see the June 2021 growth forecast be reduced by 4 per cent from a 7 per cent previously forecast.
Business investment is also expected to be worse than originally forecast, falling 17 per cent this year, with the May forecast suggesting a 13 per cent reduction.
The RBA continues to rely on a vaccine or a medical breakthrough to achieve its upside scenario as it would see the national economy bounce back harder than first predicted.
“An effective vaccine would take a bit longer to be distributed, so it would mainly affect outcomes next year and the year after. But it could also result in a stronger recovery than we have assumed even in the upside scenario presented here. A worse outcome than our downside could be conceivable if the virus cannot be contained and further waves of infection occur around the world for some years yet,” Ms Ellis said.
The RBA’s May statement on monetary policy reads: “If the lifting of restrictions is delayed, the restrictions need to be reimposed or household and business confidence remains low, the outcomes would be even more challenging than those in the baseline scenario.
“For this scenario, we assume that many restrictions remain in place until closer to the end of 2020 and international travel restrictions are in place well into next year.”
The upside scenario also assumes that infection rates fall quickly and stay low. The pace of decline in case numbers is assumed to be a bit faster than in the baseline, so the restrictions are eased a bit faster. This would be similar to the experience of some of the smaller states in recent months.
The RBA has also predicted that the economy could follow Victoria’s stage 4 lockdowns, with its downside prediction noting further restrictions and barriers to an economic recovery.
“Australia itself faces a series of outbreaks and periods of stage 3 or 4 restrictions in some states,” Ms Ellis aid. “The result is further near-term weakness in activity. Confidence is damaged and so the recovery is much slower as well. The extent of the damage would depend on how widespread and long-lasting renewed restrictions need to be to get control over the spread of the virus.”
Cameron Micallef
10 August 2020
accountantsdaily.com.au

Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced further changes to JobKeeper on 7 August 2020. The changes are intended to ensure that eligibility for the revised JobKeeper scheme – to commence on 28 September 2020 – will be based on a single quarter tax period, rather than multiple quarters as previously announced. Employees hired as at 1 July 2020 will now also be eligible to receive JobKeeper.
Treasury has updated its JobKeeper factsheets as at 7 August 2020 to incorporate the PM’s announcements.
The JobKeeper rules implemented in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic were due to finish on 27 September 2020. The Government then announced on 21 July 2020 that the scheme would be extended for six months (until 28 March 2021), in an amended form.
The key highlights of JobKeeper Version 2 – to start on 28 September – are that:
The latest changes relate to the eligibility test announced in JobKeeper Version 2.
JobKeeper Version 2 originally required that, from 28 September 2020, businesses and not-for-profits seeking to claim JobKeeper payments would have to meet a further decline in turnover test for each of the two periods of extension, as well as meeting the other existing eligibility requirements. That is, at that time businesses would have been required to reassess their eligibility for the JobKeeper extension with reference to their actual turnover in the June and September quarters 2020.
The PM has eased the proposed changes to turnover tests for businesses Australia-wide.
The changes mean that businesses will now only be required to show the requisite actual decline in turnover for the September quarter, rather than for both the June and September quarters. Similarly, businesses will only need to demonstrate a decline in turnover for the December 2020 quarter, rather than each of the June, September and December 2020 quarters.
For JobKeeper fortnights beginning on or after 3 August 2020, the reference date for determining certain employee eligibility conditions has been changed from 1 March 2020 to 1 July 2020. The purpose of this change is to extend the scope of JobKeeper so that “it also benefits employers of more recently engaged employees”.
Importantly, the changed rules preserve the existing eligibility of employees for JobKeeper payments; that is, those for whom employers are currently receiving JobKeeper, termed “1 March 2020 employees” because they satisfied the rules as at that date.
As a result, for JobKeeper fortnights beginning on or after 3 August 2020, an individual can be an eligible employee if they:
The later reference date provides the opportunity for qualifying employers to access JobKeeper for those employees who they engaged after 1 March 2020 and who were in an employment relationship as at 1 July 2020. That is, for new employees engaged after 1 March.
The changes also allow employers to qualify for JobKeeper payments for those employees who do not qualify as 1 March 2020 employees, but became eligible by meeting the conditions under the new 1 July 2020 reference date.
The amending rules make no changes to the existing eligibility of employees who are already covered by JobKeeper; that is, those for whom the employer has been receiving the benefit based on their status as at 1 March 2020. In other words, eligible 1 March 2020 employees do not need to retest (and potentially lose) their eligibility for their employer due to the introduction of the 1 July 2020 date, or satisfy any new nomination requirements.
Although employees do not qualify as 1 March 2020 employees if their employment has ceased since 1 March, they may qualify for JobKeeper if they are engaged by another employer as at 1 July 2020. Further, if 1 March 2020 employees are made redundant by an employer and are later re-employed by the same employer (including after 1 July 2020), there is scope for them to qualify without further testing.
Employers that are already participating in the JobKeeper program are required to give a notice to all employees about the revised JobKeeper reference date, other than:
Further, to be eligible for the JobKeeper payment for any newly eligible employees under the 1 July 2020 reference date, a qualifying employer must provide notice to the ATO of information about that employee and their nomination.
Where an employer has provided this notification to the ATO for entitlement to receive JobKeeper payments in respect of the eligible employee, the employer must notify the employee within seven days.
For those employers entering JobKeeper for the first time, the notification requirement will apply to all their employees.
Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced on 3 August 2020 a Federal Government “pandemic leave disaster payment”. The payment will be a one-off amount of $1,500, available to workers in Victoria who have no sick leave available who have to self-isolate for 14 days as a result of an instruction by a public health officer.
It will only apply to workers in Victoria, where the Government has declared a “state of disaster” and imposed Stage 4 lockdowns, which are expected at this point to run until mid-September.
The Victorian Government has already announced that it will provide a disaster payment, principally made to those on short-term visas; that is, those who are not permanent residents or citizens of Australia who otherwise would not have accessed Commonwealth payments. The Federal Government will provide its payment to those who fall outside that scope and who don’t have leave available to them because it has been used up.
Services Australia has provided further details on its website. It states that, to get this payment, the applicant must:
In addition, the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services must also have told the applicant to self-isolate or quarantine. They must have done this because the applicant:
If a person has to self-isolate more than once, they can claim this payment each time. However, a person cannot get this payment if they already receive:
The Victorian Government announced its Coronavirus Worker Supplement Payment on 30 July. To be eligible for a one-off $1,500 Coronavirus (COVID-19) Worker Support payment, the claimant must have been instructed by the Department of Health and Human Services:
To receive the payment, the claimant must:
There is no requirement for a claimant to be a citizen or permanent resident to be eligible for the Victorian Government payment.
The ATO has “clarified” its position on loans put on hold during COVID-19. The ATO will consider a debt to be forgiven for tax purposes if:
A debt is not considered to be forgiven if a creditor only postpones an amount payable and the debtor acknowledges the debt – unless there is evidence that the creditor will no longer rely on the obligation for repayment.
The ATO has issued an update on residency and source of income. It deals with issues from the perspectives of an Australian resident and a foreign resident in the context of a change of residency due to COVID-19.
In terms of Australian residents, the update addresses those who are temporarily overseas and those who have had to return to Australia early from certain foreign service. The latter may involve the “91 days of continuous foreign service” test.
Where the update is interesting regards what it says about foreign residents who are stuck in Australia because of the COVID-19 pandemic. The ATO acknowledges that “COVID-19 has created a special set of circumstances that must be taken into account when considering the source of the employment income earned by a foreign resident who usually works overseas but instead performs that same foreign employment in Australia”.
Whether salary or wages earned from continuing foreign employment working remotely while in Australia temporarily is assessable depends on:
Where the remote working arrangement is short-term (three months or less), the ATO readily accepts that income from that employment will not have an Australian source.
For working arrangements longer than three months, the ATO says that individual circumstances need to be examined to determine if a person’s employment is connected to Australia.
The ATO has updated its employees guide for work expenses for 2019–2020. The document is designed to assist employees to determine whether incurred expenses are tax deductible and outlines the substantiation requirements.
The following are highlighted as being new for 2019–2020:
The employees guide highlights “common myths” about expenses – for example, the myths that everyone can automatically claim $150 for clothing and laundry, 5,000 km of travel under the cents per kilometre method for car expenses, or $300 for work-related expenses, even if they didn’t spend the money, or that employees can claim gym membership if they need to be fit for work.
The ATO has published a fact sheet to assist employers in determining if they have an FBT liability where cars are garaged at employees’ homes because of COVID-19.
The fact sheet states that the ATO will accept that an employer isn’t holding a car for the purposes of providing fringe benefits where the car isn’t being driven at all, or is only being driven for maintenance purposes. Provided that the employer elects to use the operating cost method and maintains odometer records, the employer will not have an FBT liability for a car. Without electing to use the operating cost method or not having odometer records, the statutory formula method applies and an FBT liability will arise as the car garaged at the employee’s home is taken to be available for private use.
Where a home-garaged car is being driven by an employee for business purposes, the ATO says the employer may be able to reduce the taxable value of the car fringe benefit by taking into account the business use, provided the employer has logbook records and odometer records for the period in question. Logbook records will need to be for at least:
The fact sheet also provides information on logbook requirements for car fringe benefits and options for employers to consider where COVID-19 has impacted driving patterns.
The High Court of Australia has preserved the long-standing industry practice regarding personal/carer’s leave accruals in a significant ruling that has been welcomed by employers that were potentially set to face a substantial back-pay bill.

The High Court of Australia has granted the appeals by Mondelēz International and the Australian government against the previous decision of the Full Federal Court, clarifying the quantum of personal/carer’s leave entitlements for millions of employees.
The Full Federal Court’s 2019 ruling against Mondelēz found the Fair Work Act’s minimum 10 days of paid personal leave should be given to permanent employees regardless of the number of days worked per week or number of hours per day.
But a summary issued by the High Court of Australia on Thursday revealed that a majority of the High Court rejected the “working day” construction and instead held that what is meant by a “day” or “10 days” must be calculated by reference to an employee’s ordinary hours of work.
“Because patterns of work do not always follow two-week cycles, the entitlement to ‘10 days’ of paid personal/carer’s leave can be calculated as 1/26 of an employee’s ordinary hours of work in a year,” the summary reads.
Commenting on the outcome, Innes Willox, chief executive of national employer association Ai Group, said the High Court’s judgment preserves widespread industry practice.
“If the Federal Court’s interpretation of the expression ‘10 days of paid personal/carer’s leave’ in section 96 of the Fair Work Act had been upheld, there would have been major cost implications for a very large number of businesses,” Mr Willox said.
“In addition, a major barrier would have been imposed on employers agreeing to part-time employment arrangements, including for employees returning from parental leave.”
Mr Willox noted that the case was brought on because of action relating to “12-hour shift workers at the Mondelēz International plant in Claremont, Tasmania”, but the Federal Court’s ultimate ruling had implications for most employers in Australia.
In turn, the interpretation adopted by the High Court ensures that all employees are entitled to take up to two weeks off work each year for personal/carer’s leave regardless of how many ordinary hours an employee works in that two-week period.
“A full-time employee who works 38 ordinary hours per week is entitled to 76 hours of personal/carer’s leave per year, and a part-time employee who works 20 hours per week is entitled to 40 hours of personal/carer’s leave per year,” Mr Willox explained. “The court’s judgment ensures equity among full-time and part-time employees, and among eight-hour and 12-hour shift workers.”
Tracy Angwin, CEO of the Australian Payroll Association, also welcomed the final outcome of a case that had cast a shadow over some 1 million shift workers around the country, noting that the “outcome will come as a major relief to employers and payroll professionals”.
Ms Angwin said: “The original decision would have placed significant additional financial burden on companies, and also created a disparity in entitlements for part-time employees, and a level of complexity that could lead to employers re-considering flexible working arrangements.
“We are pleased to see that the historical understanding of personal leave accruals has been upheld.”
‘Win for employers’
Employsure managing director Ed Mallett referred to the ruling as a win for employers who have already been stretched to breaking point over the past year due to COVID-19.
He advised employers to communicate with their staff on the outcome of the High Court’s decision, to avoid any potential confusion.
“If an employer changed how personal leave operates following the original Federal Court ruling last August, they need to update their payroll system accordingly,” Mr Mallett said.
“Staff need to be assured that they don’t need to do a thing, and that when personal or carer’s leave is taken, the business will comply with the governing legislation.
“If an employer did not change how personal leave operates as a result of last August’s decision, the employer should still reiterate with staff that the way they operate personal or carer’s leave in the business is accurate, and no further action is needed.”
Maja Garaca Djurdjevic
14 August 2020
accountantsdaily.com.au
Several new links have been added to the many already in this article, links that date back to the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. If you have any questions, or require further assistance, please send us an email or phone.

Please click on the following links to access a wide range of Covid-19 related guidelines and resources for both Federal and State Government initiatives. Once done, click on the X (top right) to close the article and you'll return to this list. NB: Internet links are often altered by the source which means some of the following might not link properly. Ongoing testing is done to try and ensure this problem is minimised.
Latest Updates:
Jobkeeper Update – Extension to March 2021. Read more ….
Victorian Government Stage 4 Restrictions. Read more ….
Victoria – Health and Human Services – Stage 4 restrictions. Read more ….
Victoria – State Revenue Office – Land Tax. Read more ….
Federal Government COVID-19 Updates. Read more ….
NSW – New round of small business grants. Read more ….
Qld – Round 2 of Small Business COVID-19 Adaption Grant Program opens. Read more ….
Vic – Range of videos explaining topics effected by COVID-19 such as Land tax and Payroll Tax. Read more ….
Tas – An update on all COVID-19 matters in Tasmania. Read more ….
ACT – Updated 30-6-2020. Read more ….
SA – Updates for Land tax deferrals and Job Accelerator Grants. Read more ….
NT – COVID-19 Update. Read more ….
Previous Updates
COVID-19 Safe App. Download now
Myths about COVID-19 are all over social media. Here is the our Government's mythbusting response. Read more ….
$131.4 million Federal funding to help Public Hospital fight effects of COVID-19. Read more ….
$48.1 million for mental health & wellbeing pandemic response plan. Read more ….
State and Territory Government websites. Their latest responses to the coronavirus pandemic.
3 Step Framework for a Covidsafe Australia. Click here.
Easing of coronavirus (Covid-19) restrictions. Read more …
Covid-19 JobKeeper Payments: Frequently asked questions